Google accuses India’s antitrust regulator to be a “habitual offender”


Image courtesy: CNBC TV 18

The Indian antitrust regulator, which the watchdog rejects, was charged by Google in a court on Friday of being a “habitual criminal” for disclosing sensitive material of the cases under review. The Times of India and Reuters reported Saturday that an inquiry by the CCI determined that the Alphabet’s Google exploited its dominant Android operating system in India by illegally utilising its “great financial strength” to harm competitors.

Google sued the CCI at the Delhi Court on Thursday in an unprecedented step, claiming in a statement it “revolutionised the distrust” and “was aimed to avoid such unlawful confidential findings.” Google acknowledged India to be a ‘habitual criminal’ on Friday by disclosing sensitive data from cases it examined, an allegation denied by the guard.

The Times of India and Reuters reported on Saturday that the CCI inquiry determined that Alphabet’s Google was misusers of its powerful Android operating system in India by illegally harming its competitors with its “vast financial strength.”

Google sued CCI at the high court in Delhi Thursday, in a rare step, claiming in a declaration that it was “protesting against breaks of trust” and “preventing all further illegal confidentiality information”

Google Calls India Watchdog 'Habitual Offender' in Court Tussle Over Probe  Leak | Technology News

“A government entity is accused of it. Not a word in all of this affidavit shows how we did it and where the evidence is, “Venkataraman claimed, requesting to be withdrawn from Google’s submission. “What do we have in this court to do with what we have said?”

Justice Rekha Palli recorded both parties’ statements in an order and planned a further Monday hearing. The CCI did not answer a request for comment immediately, but Google declined to comment after the hearing.

In 2019, the antitrust authorities authorised the inquiry, stating that Google seemed to have increased its pre-installation ability to restrict the capacity of device-makers to choose other versions for the mobile operating system.

According to the 750-page study, the experts determined that compulsory pre-installation of applications “compensates the device makers with unfair conditions” in breach of Indian Competition Law. In the Reuters investigation, the firm also determined that its play store app store’s position was used to maintain its supremacy.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here